Obama St. Louis

Vote Irregularities in New York?

February 16, 2008 · 4 Comments

The New York Times has a very interesting articledrawing attention to some very unusual vote count irregularities in New York.  Some of the most striking examples are election areas that first reported to be sweeps for Clinton are now showing significant uncounted votes for Obama that could change the delegate count in New York in favor of Obama…

In the Harlem district, for instance, where the primary night returns suggested a 141 to 0 sweep by Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, the vote now stands at 261 to 136. In an even more heavily black district in Brooklyn — where the vote on primary night was recorded as 118 to 0 for Mrs. Clinton — she now barely leads, 118 to 116.

Although the article is careful to draw any conclusions about intentional wrong-doing, the quotes from the people involved with the process and the data speaks for itself…

But Gordon J. Davis, a former New York City parks commissioner and an Obama poll watcher in the district, remained skeptical, even after being informed of the corrected count.

“First it was reported at 141 to 0, now it’s 261 to 136 in an Assembly district that went 12,000 to 8,000 for Barack,” Mr. Davis said on Friday.

“I was watching like a hawk, but how did I know the machine had a mind of its own?” he added. “And I speak as one who grew up on the South Side of Chicago where we delivered the margin of victory for John F. Kennedy at 4 in the morning.”

At the sprawling Riverside Park Community apartments at Broadway and 135th Street, Alician D. Barksdale said she had voted for Mr. Obama and her daughter had, too, by absentee ballot.

“Everyone around here voted for him,” she said.

The 53rd Assembly District, in Brooklyn, is represented by the borough’s Democratic chairman, Assemblyman Vito P. Lopez, another Clinton supporter. He said the party faithful have produced lopsided margins of as much as 160 to 4 and that on Primary Day he fielded election captains in every district to galvanize Hispanic voters for Mrs. Clinton.

“We ran it the old-fashioned way,” he said. Still, he said, the 118 to 0 vote “has to be a mistake.”

Categories: News
Tagged: , , , , ,

4 responses so far ↓

  • greta // February 16, 2008 at 8:36 pm | Reply

    hey! I live in Assembly District 53 in Brooklyn and I DEFINITELY voted for Obama! WTF?

  • Timo Kuhn // February 18, 2008 at 7:46 pm | Reply

    i also live in assembly district 53… and I also voted for Obama…

  • Mayor of New York Claims Vote ‘Fraud’ « Obama St. Louis // February 21, 2008 at 2:43 am | Reply

    [...] Reported last weekin the New York Times, several precincts in predominantly African American neighborhoods showed no votes for Obama with Hillary Clinton receiving all of the votes.  The initial investigation by the Times uncovered dozens of districts with “significant under-counting”.  Unofficial tallies on election night gave Obama no votes in 78 different election districts. [...]

  • Barbara // February 21, 2008 at 3:18 am | Reply

    Continue the investigation. I also wonder how many of the Latino/Hispanic votes are legal especially in California, and New Mexico. We all know that there has been vote tampering in the past. We’ve been shown how easy it is to tamper with the voting machines. Here we go again.
    I can’t see how there are no votes registered for African Americans in those districts.
    Investigate, investigate, investigate.

Leave a Comment